LogoAntiCirc
Explore all countries
🇵🇰

Pakistan

Asia & the Pacific

0%

of males circumcised

Among the highest in the world

Demographics

Circumcision rate, in context

Estimated share of males circumcised

Pakistan96%
United States71%
Global average38%

Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average ≈ 38%.

The picture in Pakistan

An estimated 96% of males are circumcised in Pakistan (Asia & the Pacific).

Asia & the Pacific 96% prevalence

By the Numbers

Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.

Circumcision rate

% of males

96%

Pakistan96%
United States71%
Global average43.3%

Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.

Sexually Transmitted Infections

HIV and related indicators — context, not proof that circumcision protects.

Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission — it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe Pakistan; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.

How STIs actually spread — and what protects you
Adults living with HIV

1 in 500 adults

Newly infected each year

1 in 5,000 people

Of those with HIV, on treatment

16 / 100

New HIV infections vs 2010

up 84% — getting worse

Sexual Education

How well-equipped young people are with the facts.

Sex-education gap

85 / 100 — large gap
ComprehensiveLarge gap

Comprehensive sex education is widely regarded as the most effective — and least invasive — tool for sexual health. This score estimates the gap between what young people in Pakistan are taught and best practice: a higher number means a wider gap. Education, not surgery, is what consistently improves outcomes.

Research coverage

How complete and source-backed this country file is.

Deep-built

Sources

8

Legal status

Curated

Write-up

Available

Incidents

2 verified

Derived from current data.

Open full research file

The law

Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.

Unregulated

Pakistan has no statute specifically regulating, restricting, or banning non-therapeutic male circumcision of minors — it is a near-universal Islamic religious rite. What is regulated is WHO may perform medical procedures, under general anti-quackery / medical-practice law (the Pakistan Medical Commission Act 2020 and provincial Healthcare Commission Acts), though enforcement against informal circumcisers is weak.

No circumcision-specific law surfaced in any source (an absence-of-evidence finding), as expected for a near-universal religious practice. Instead, unqualified circumcisers fall under Pakistan's general medical-practice / anti-quackery framework: the Pakistan Medical Commission Act 2020 restricts the practice of medicine to registered, licensed practitioners, and provincial Healthcare Commission Acts (e.g. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 2015; Punjab) empower commissions to seal unregistered clinics and prosecute "quacks". (Specific penalty figures rest on a single secondary/law-firm source and should be re-verified against statute text — only the general framework is asserted here.) Enforcement is weak in practice: unregistered facilities operate openly, and the great majority of circumcisions are done outside the regulated medical sector. Male circumcision must not be conflated with female genital cutting; some Dawoodi Bohra Shia communities in South Asia practise female khatna/FGC, which is a SEPARATE practice noted only to disambiguate the shared term "khatna". Status UNREGULATED reflects the absence of a circumcision-specific statute.

Compare circumcision law across countries

Research about Pakistan

Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.

Religious motive dominant; ~12% complication rate; safety/provider mix.

Trained-provider AE rate 4.1% — counter-example to the informal sector.

Near-universal among the Muslim majority (~96%+; highest band).

Documented harm in Pakistan

Individual cases reported in the press or official records — not a measured complication rate. See all countries →

ComplicationAt-home / informalAggregate2010–2017 studies · Pakistan (national / multi-study)

Pakistani peer-reviewed studies report an overall circumcision complication rate around 12% (bleeding commonest, then infection), with glans/urethral injury linked to barber/bone-cutter methods; roughly a quarter of circumcisions in one central-Pakistan study were performed by quacks.

AGGREGATE row (not a single case): synthesises Anwer et al. 2017 (954 boys, 12.1% complications; ~20% at home; 69.6% open-blade without anaesthesia) and the J Sheikh Zayed Medical College 2010 series (23.17% by quacks; barber/bone-cutter glans/urethral injuries). Provider/setting/harm fields reflect the dominant informal-sector pattern. By contrast, a trained Plastibell programme achieved a 4.1% adverse-event rate.

Permanent injuryHospitalSept 2024 · Mirali, North Waziristan (KP) · age 0

At THQ Hospital, Mirali, North Waziristan, two medical technicians injured a newborn's genitals during circumcision; the District Health Officer suspended both and a three-member inquiry committee was formed.

SINGLE-SOURCE, not independently corroborated (verification AI_COMPILED). Notable as a PUBLIC-FACILITY case rather than a traditional circumciser. Surfaced ~20 days later when the father complained. Reported by Daily Pakistan (12 Sep 2024).

Permanent injuryClinicMay 2022 · Sialkot, Punjab · age 3

At an unregistered private facility in Sialkot, an unqualified practitioner damaged the genitals of two brothers — Muhammad Sahil (3) and Muhammad Ayan (1) — during circumcision; both developed infection, confirmed at Children's Hospital, Sialkot.

The facility was not registered with the Punjab Healthcare Commission and was reputed to reuse non-sterilised instruments. The father lodged complaints with the health department, the deputy commissioner and Muradpura police. Reported by Dawn (23 May 2022). Single event affecting two children (caseCount 2).

Benchmarks & context

International evidence for reading the figures above — not measured Pakistan rates.

US claims cohort (Shah et al., 2015, n≈1.4M)<0.5%

~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)

Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%–0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10–20× higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1–9) than neonatally — directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8–12).

[104]
WHO VMMC programmes (regulated)~1–3 / 100,000

Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10–14, trained providers

Severe adverse events on the order of 1–3 per 100,000 — but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.

[105]
WHO complication briefs (VMMC)32 fistula · 8/12 tetanus deaths

Cases reported to WHO, 2014–2018

WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014–2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings — not a national rate.

[66]
Provider setting — Turkey & Kenya series85% vs 2.6% · 35% vs 17%

Traditional vs physician providers

One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes — the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.

[66]
AAP policy (2012)Benefits “not great enough”

American Academy of Pediatrics task force

Benefits said to outweigh risks but “not great enough” to recommend routine circumcision — leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.

[93]
US neonatal circumcision (correlational deaths)200 / 9.83M (10 yrs)

Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001–2010

200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions — explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.

[91]

News from Pakistan

No articles yet

We don't have news for Pakistan yet — but you can still join the discussion below.

Discussions from Pakistan

Start a discussion

No community discussions for Pakistan yet — be the first to start one.

View all discussions in Pakistan