LogoAntiCirc
Explore all countries
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

India

Asia & the Pacific

0%

of males circumcised

Rare

Demographics

Circumcision rate, in context

Estimated share of males circumcised

India14%
United States71%
Global average38%

Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average โ‰ˆ 38%.

The picture in India

Circumcision in India is practised mainly among the Muslim minority as a religious rite; it is uncommon among the Hindu majority.

Asia & the Pacific 14% prevalence

By the Numbers

Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.

Circumcision rate

% of males

14%

India14%
United States71%
Global average43.3%

Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.

Sexually Transmitted Infections

HIV and related indicators โ€” context, not proof that circumcision protects.

Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission โ€” it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe India; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.

How STIs actually spread โ€” and what protects you
Adults living with HIV

1 in 500 adults

Newly infected each year

1 in 20,000 people

Of those with HIV, on treatment

70 / 100

New HIV infections vs 2010

down 44% โ€” getting better

Sexual Education

How well-equipped young people are with the facts.

Sex-education gap

62 / 100 โ€” moderate gap
ComprehensiveLarge gap

Comprehensive sex education is widely regarded as the most effective โ€” and least invasive โ€” tool for sexual health. This score estimates the gap between what young people in India are taught and best practice: a higher number means a wider gap. Education, not surgery, is what consistently improves outcomes.

Research coverage

How complete and source-backed this country file is.

Deep-built

Sources

8

Legal status

Curated

Write-up

Available

Incidents

None verified

Derived from current data.

Open full research file

The law

Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.

Unregulated

India has no statute regulating or restricting non-therapeutic male circumcision of minors. It is a religious-minority practice (khatna), and a 2023 Public Interest Litigation in the Kerala High Court seeking to criminalise it was dismissed โ€” the court holding it "is not a law-making body."

Non-therapeutic male circumcision is legally unaddressed in India; no law sets a minimum age, regulates, or prohibits it. On 11 February 2023 a PIL filed in the Kerala High Court by "Non-Religious Citizens" and five others sought to declare non-therapeutic circumcision of Muslim boys illegal and a cognizable, non-bailable offence (argued as violating Article 21), and to direct the government to enact a prohibitory law. A Division Bench (Chief Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Murali Purushothaman) dismissed it on 29 March 2023, holding "the Court is not a law-making body" and that the petitioners had not substantiated their case. The petition's very ask โ€” that the government ENACT a ban โ€” confirms no such statute exists. (Strictly separate context, not conflated: India also has female genital cutting (khafz, colloquially also "khatna") among the Dawoodi Bohra community, the subject of a separate Supreme Court matter; that is FGC, not male circumcision, and its specifics are not asserted here.) Status UNREGULATED reflects the absence of statute.

Compare circumcision law across countries

Research about India

Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.

~13.5% (modelled) โ€” low-prevalence, religious-minority practice.

NFHS-4 16%; state range 2.5%โ†’94.5% (Muslim Lakshadweep).

Circumcision as a marker of Muslim identity ("without khatna a Hindu").

Documented Kashmir circumcision-mishap series (no deaths).

Documented harm in India

Individual cases reported in the press or official records โ€” not a measured complication rate. See all countries โ†’

ComplicationClinicAggregate ยท 342017โ€“2021 ยท Kashmir Valley (SKIMS Medical College referrals)

A peer-reviewed study at SKIMS Medical College (Hassan et al., African Journal of Paediatric Surgery 2022) treated 34 circumcision mishaps among Kashmiri Muslim boys (2017โ€“2021): massive bleeding (32.35%, attributed to non-medical "half doctors"), incomplete circumcision (52.94%), multiple skin bridges (8.82%) and incomplete circumcision with glans injury (5.88%). All were treated with good outcomes and there was no mortality.

Aggregate referred-complication series (isAggregate=true โ†’ excluded from the single-case incident tally), NOT a population complication or mortality rate. The harms were attributed to non-medical practitioners, not to clinically-performed circumcision. (A media-reported 2018 child death in Vadanapally, Kerala, referenced in the 2023 Kerala PIL, is NOT recorded here as it was not independently sourced in this pass.) "khatna" here is MALE circumcision.

Benchmarks & context

International evidence for reading the figures above โ€” not measured India rates.

US claims cohort (Shah et al., 2015, nโ‰ˆ1.4M)<0.5%

~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)

Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%โ€“0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10โ€“20ร— higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1โ€“9) than neonatally โ€” directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8โ€“12).

[104]
WHO VMMC programmes (regulated)~1โ€“3 / 100,000

Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10โ€“14, trained providers

Severe adverse events on the order of 1โ€“3 per 100,000 โ€” but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.

[105]
WHO complication briefs (VMMC)32 fistula ยท 8/12 tetanus deaths

Cases reported to WHO, 2014โ€“2018

WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014โ€“2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings โ€” not a national rate.

[66]
Provider setting โ€” Turkey & Kenya series85% vs 2.6% ยท 35% vs 17%

Traditional vs physician providers

One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes โ€” the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.

[66]
AAP policy (2012)Benefits โ€œnot great enoughโ€

American Academy of Pediatrics task force

Benefits said to outweigh risks but โ€œnot great enoughโ€ to recommend routine circumcision โ€” leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.

[93]
US neonatal circumcision (correlational deaths)200 / 9.83M (10 yrs)

Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001โ€“2010

200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions โ€” explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.

[91]

News from India

No articles yet

We don't have news for India yet โ€” but you can still join the discussion below.

Discussions from India

Start a discussion

No community discussions for India yet โ€” be the first to start one.

View all discussions in India