Venezuela
Latin America
of males circumcised
Rare
Demographics
Circumcision rate, in context
Estimated share of males circumcised
Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average ≈ 38%.
The picture in Venezuela
An estimated 5% of males are circumcised in Venezuela (Latin America).
By the Numbers
Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.
Circumcision rate
% of males
0%
Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.
Sexually Transmitted Infections
HIV and related indicators — context, not proof that circumcision protects.
Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission — it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe Venezuela; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.
How STIs actually spread — and what protects you1 in 170 adults
Research coverage
How complete and source-backed this country file is.
Sources
8
Legal status
Curated
Write-up
Available
Incidents
None verified
Derived from current data.
Open full research fileThe law
Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.
Venezuela has no statute specifically regulating non-therapeutic male circumcision — it is a near-zero, culturally foreign practice governed by general medical regulation, with the public health system covering circumcision only for a medical indication. This is an absence-of-evidence finding, not a prohibition. Female genital mutilation is not a documented Venezuelan practice and does not bear on male circumcision.
No Venezuelan law specifically regulating, restricting, or banning non-therapeutic male circumcision was located (an absence-of-evidence finding). Venezuela's principal violence-against-women statute — the Ley Orgánica sobre el Derecho de las Mujeres a una Vida Libre de Violencia — contains no reference to 'circuncisión', 'mutilación genital femenina' or 'ablación'; its enumeration of gender-violence forms (psychological, harassment, sexual, obstetric, etc.) includes no female-genital-cutting category (the only 'mutilation' reference is a generic femicide-aggravation clause, not genital cutting — AI summaries that paraphrased it as 'genital mutilation' are artifacts). Male circumcision thus falls under general medical regulation, with the public system covering it only for a documented medical indication. This finding is verified absence in the principal relevant statute; it cannot prove no regulation exists anywhere in Venezuelan law, only that the main statute is silent. Female genital mutilation is not a documented Venezuelan practice and is mentioned only to disambiguate — it is never conflated with male circumcision. Status UNREGULATED reflects the absence of a male-circumcision-specific statute.
Research about Venezuela
Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.
Among the world's lowest ~0.33% (Morris 2016) — ~100× below the global mean.
Part of the uniform LatAm intact-norm cluster.
Concentrated HIV (~0.5-0.9% general vs MSM ~7.8%); not a VMMC country.
Post-2015 crisis broke HIV treatment (ART collapse) — context, not circ.
Benchmarks & context
International evidence for reading the figures above — not measured Venezuela rates.
~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)
Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%–0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10–20× higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1–9) than neonatally — directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8–12).
[104]Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10–14, trained providers
Severe adverse events on the order of 1–3 per 100,000 — but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.
[105]Cases reported to WHO, 2014–2018
WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014–2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings — not a national rate.
[66]Traditional vs physician providers
One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes — the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.
[66]American Academy of Pediatrics task force
Benefits said to outweigh risks but “not great enough” to recommend routine circumcision — leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.
[93]Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001–2010
200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions — explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.
[91]News from Venezuela
No articles yet
We don't have news for Venezuela yet — but you can still join the discussion below.
Discussions from Venezuela
No community discussions for Venezuela yet — be the first to start one.
View all discussions in Venezuela