LogoAntiCirc
Explore all countries
🇬🇱

Greenland

North America

0%

of males circumcised

Rare

Demographics

Circumcision rate, in context

Estimated share of males circumcised

Greenland2%
United States71%
Global average38%

Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average ≈ 38%.

The picture in Greenland

An estimated 2% of males are circumcised in Greenland (North America).

North America 2% prevalence

By the Numbers

Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.

Circumcision rate

% of males

0.1%

Greenland0.1%
United States71%
Global average43.3%

Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.

Sexually Transmitted Infections

HIV and related indicators — context, not proof that circumcision protects.

Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission — it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe Greenland; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.

How STIs actually spread — and what protects you
Adults living with HIV

1 in 670 adults

Research coverage

How complete and source-backed this country file is.

Deep-built

Sources

8

Legal status

Curated

Write-up

Available

Incidents

None verified

Derived from current data.

Open full research file

The law

Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.

Unregulated

This research did not locate a Greenlandic or Danish statute specifically addressing non-therapeutic male circumcision as applying to (or being distinct in) Greenland — whether Denmark's 2014 Circumcision Act automatically extends to Greenland, or whether Greenland's own Self-Government Act (2009) authority over health matters means it could set a separate rule, could not be confirmed either way from verified sources. Greenland's own children's-rights ombudsperson institution (MIO, established 2012) co-signed a 2013 Nordic declaration opposing non-therapeutic male circumcision, as a distinct signatory from Denmark's children's council. This research did not independently verify Greenland's female genital mutilation legal status either; no evidence of any FGM practice or discussion was found for Greenland, consistent with the absence of a historical FGM tradition among Inuit peoples, though this too is an absence-of-mention finding rather than a first-source confirmation. Female genital mutilation is a separate matter and must not be conflated with male circumcision.

Compare circumcision law across countries

Research about Greenland

Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.

Morris 2016: Greenland 0.1% (confirmed 3-0) is an EXPLICIT unmeasured methodological floor value, not a real measurement - unrevised in the erratum.

No indigenous/cultural circumcision tradition documented among Greenlandic Inuit, consistent with the broader Arctic-indigenous pattern.

Real Greenland-specific HIV data exists (Rex et al. 2013 SSI cohort study): ~0.15-0.17% adult prevalence, 2009-11, predominantly heterosexual transmission - unlike New Caledonia's pure case-count gap.

Benchmarks & context

International evidence for reading the figures above — not measured Greenland rates.

US claims cohort (Shah et al., 2015, n≈1.4M)<0.5%

~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)

Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%–0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10–20× higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1–9) than neonatally — directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8–12).

[104]
WHO VMMC programmes (regulated)~1–3 / 100,000

Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10–14, trained providers

Severe adverse events on the order of 1–3 per 100,000 — but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.

[105]
WHO complication briefs (VMMC)32 fistula · 8/12 tetanus deaths

Cases reported to WHO, 2014–2018

WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014–2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings — not a national rate.

[66]
Provider setting — Turkey & Kenya series85% vs 2.6% · 35% vs 17%

Traditional vs physician providers

One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes — the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.

[66]
AAP policy (2012)Benefits “not great enough”

American Academy of Pediatrics task force

Benefits said to outweigh risks but “not great enough” to recommend routine circumcision — leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.

[93]
US neonatal circumcision (correlational deaths)200 / 9.83M (10 yrs)

Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001–2010

200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions — explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.

[91]

News from Greenland

No articles yet

We don't have news for Greenland yet — but you can still join the discussion below.

Discussions from Greenland

Start a discussion

No community discussions for Greenland yet — be the first to start one.

View all discussions in Greenland