LogoAntiCirc
Explore all countries
🇪🇷

Eritrea

Sub-Saharan Africa

0%

of males circumcised

Among the highest in the world

Demographics

Circumcision rate, in context

Estimated share of males circumcised

Eritrea90%
United States71%
Global average38%

Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average ≈ 38%.

The picture in Eritrea

An estimated 90% of males are circumcised in Eritrea (Sub-Saharan Africa).

Sub-Saharan Africa 90% prevalence

By the Numbers

Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.

Circumcision rate

% of males

97%

Eritrea97%
United States71%
Global average43.3%

Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.

Sexually Transmitted Infections

HIV and related indicators — context, not proof that circumcision protects.

Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission — it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe Eritrea; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.

How STIs actually spread — and what protects you
Adults living with HIV

1 in 500 adults

Research coverage

How complete and source-backed this country file is.

Deep-built

Sources

8

Legal status

Curated

Write-up

Available

Incidents

None verified

Derived from current data.

Open full research file

The law

Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.

Unregulated

Eritrea's Penal Code (2015) contains no provision restricting, regulating, or prohibiting non-therapeutic male circumcision. The practice is legally unrestricted — an absence-of-evidence finding. Female genital mutilation is a completely separate practice, criminalised under Proclamation No. 158/2007 (Female Circumcision Abolition Proclamation), with penalties of 2–3 years imprisonment and 5,000–10,000 Nakfa fine (rising to 5–10 years if death results). Proclamation 158/2007 applies exclusively to female genital cutting and has no bearing on male circumcision.

Eritrea's Penal Code (2015) was searched for provisions on non-therapeutic male circumcision; none were found. Male circumcision is legally unrestricted — an absence-of-evidence finding, not a positive permission. FGM (female genital mutilation) is an entirely separate practice and separate legal category. Eritrea criminalised FGM under Proclamation No. 158/2007 (Female Circumcision Abolition Proclamation): penalties of 2–3 years imprisonment and 5,000–10,000 Nakfa fine; rising to 5–10 years imprisonment if death results; no religious exemption. Since 2007, 155 FGM cases have been prosecuted. FGM prevalence (EPHS 2010: ~83% of women 15–49; declining from 95% in 1995 and 89% in 2002) reflects the FEMALE practice. No FGM datum is ever recorded as male circumcision harm.

Compare circumcision law across countries

Research about Eritrea

Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.

Gash-Barka: 89.2% THP-performed; 96.8% families circumcised (regional, not national).

FGM ~83% (EPHS 2010), criminalised Proclamation 158/2007 — FEMALE ONLY, never conflated.

HIV ~0.2% low-level epidemic (NOT generalised); not VMMC priority; no circ↔HIV claim.

~97.2% (Morris 2016/EPHS 2010); both Orthodox (cultural) + Muslim (khitan) → near-universal.

Morris et al. 2016 — global prevalence (Eritrea ~97.2%, citing EPHS 2010)Brian J. Morris, Richard G. Wamai, Elijah B. Henebeng, et al.[819]

Benchmarks & context

International evidence for reading the figures above — not measured Eritrea rates.

US claims cohort (Shah et al., 2015, n≈1.4M)<0.5%

~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)

Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%–0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10–20× higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1–9) than neonatally — directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8–12).

[104]
WHO VMMC programmes (regulated)~1–3 / 100,000

Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10–14, trained providers

Severe adverse events on the order of 1–3 per 100,000 — but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.

[105]
WHO complication briefs (VMMC)32 fistula · 8/12 tetanus deaths

Cases reported to WHO, 2014–2018

WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014–2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings — not a national rate.

[66]
Provider setting — Turkey & Kenya series85% vs 2.6% · 35% vs 17%

Traditional vs physician providers

One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes — the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.

[66]
AAP policy (2012)Benefits “not great enough”

American Academy of Pediatrics task force

Benefits said to outweigh risks but “not great enough” to recommend routine circumcision — leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.

[93]
US neonatal circumcision (correlational deaths)200 / 9.83M (10 yrs)

Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001–2010

200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions — explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.

[91]

News from Eritrea

No articles yet

We don't have news for Eritrea yet — but you can still join the discussion below.

Discussions from Eritrea

Start a discussion

No community discussions for Eritrea yet — be the first to start one.

View all discussions in Eritrea