Benin
Sub-Saharan Africa
of males circumcised
Among the highest in the world
Demographics
Circumcision rate, in context
Estimated share of males circumcised
Estimates derived from WHO/UNAIDS-based prevalence data. Global average ≈ 38%.
The picture in Benin
An estimated 95% of males are circumcised in Benin (Sub-Saharan Africa).
By the Numbers
Circumcision prevalence with HIV, education & policy indicators as context. Tap any card to compare.
Circumcision rate
% of males
93%
Context indicators from public UNAIDS/WHO-based sources; some scores are editorial or pending. Figures describe each country and are not evidence of causation.
Sexually Transmitted Infections
HIV and related indicators — context, not proof that circumcision protects.
Circumcision is often sold as protection against HIV and other infections. That claim comes from a narrow set of trials and applies, at most, to one route of transmission — it is not general STI protection. The figures below describe Benin; they reflect many factors (testing, behaviour, healthcare access, and reporting) and are not evidence that circumcision causes or prevents them.
How STIs actually spread — and what protects you1 in 91 adults
Research coverage
How complete and source-backed this country file is.
Sources
8
Legal status
Curated
Write-up
Available
Incidents
None verified
Derived from current data.
Open full research fileThe law
Legal status of non-therapeutic circumcision of minors.
Benin has no statute specifically regulating non-therapeutic male circumcision — the authoritative Cornell LII gender-justice database lists ten Beninese legal provisions, none of which touches male circumcision, and the only genital-cutting law is FGM-specific. It is a near-universal traditional/religious practice governed only by general medical regulation. Female genital mutilation is a strictly separate, female-only matter: it is criminalised (Law No. 2003-03 of 3 March 2003) and does not bear on male circumcision.
No Beninese law specifically regulates, restricts, or bans non-therapeutic male circumcision (an absence-of-evidence finding scoped to the Cornell LII gender-justice database, which lists ten provisions — the Constitution, Code de l'enfant, Code des personnes et de la famille, Code du travail, Acts 2006-04 / 2011-26 / 2007-03 / 2006-19, Case DCC 02-144, and Act No. 2003-03 on FGM — none addressing male circumcision). It is consistent with male circumcision being a culturally normalised non-issue governed only by general medical regulation. Female genital mutilation is an entirely separate, FEMALE practice: it is criminalised by Law No. 2003-03 of 3 March 2003 (Loi portant répression de la pratique des mutilations génitales féminines), applied nationwide, whose Article 3 defines FGM strictly as removal of 'the external genitalia of a female' (an exhaustive search found zero references to male circumcision). Penalties are tiered (base Article 4 = 6 months–3 years + 100,000–2,000,000 CFA, with up to 3 years + 3,000,000 CFA for aggravated/minor cases). FGM is low nationally (~7.14%, 2011-12 DHS) but heavily concentrated in the north and among specific ethnic groups (Borgou 46.5%, Peulh/Fulani 51.7%, Bariba 47.9%) versus the south (Fon 0.2%, Adja 0.4%); it persists especially in the north despite the law. The two practices are kept strictly separate and never conflated. Status UNREGULATED reflects the absence of a male-circumcision-specific statute.
Research about Benin
Peer-reviewed findings specific to this country, from our reference library.
Near-universal ~92.9% (Morris 2016, from Benin DHS 2011-12).
Corroborated >80% (WHO 2006) / 84% (Williams 2006).
Rate exceeds Muslim share → a cultural norm crossing religious lines.
Low/concentrated sex-work-driven HIV (~1.1%); circ near-universal → no VMMC.
Benchmarks & context
International evidence for reading the figures above — not measured Benin rates.
~1,400,920 circumcisions, all ages (US insurance claims data)
Total adverse events under 0.5%; serious AEs ~0.0008%–0.07%. Crucially, AE rates 10–20× higher when done AFTER infancy (ages 1–9) than neonatally — directly relevant where boys are cut older (e.g. PH tuli at ~8–12).
[104]Voluntary medical male circumcision, ages 10–14, trained providers
Severe adverse events on the order of 1–3 per 100,000 — but ONLY with trained providers, quality assurance and informed consent. The benchmark for what safe, supervised provision looks like; the opposite end from informal provision.
[105]Cases reported to WHO, 2014–2018
WHO logged 32 urethral-fistula cases (2014–2018) and, in one tetanus consultation, 8 deaths among 12 associated cases. Illustrative of rare-but-severe harms in unhygienic settings — not a national rate.
[66]Traditional vs physician providers
One Turkish series found 85% complications with traditional providers vs 2.6% with physicians; a Kenyan one 35% vs 17%. Provider setting dominates outcomes — the pattern behind warnings about informal practitioners everywhere.
[66]American Academy of Pediatrics task force
Benefits said to outweigh risks but “not great enough” to recommend routine circumcision — leaving the decision to families. The reference point invoked on both sides of the consent/necessity debate.
[93]Inpatient neonatal circumcisions, 2001–2010
200 early deaths over ten years among 9.83 million inpatient neonatal circumcisions — explicitly correlational, NOT causal. A measured counterpoint to higher litigation-cited estimates.
[91]News from Benin
No articles yet
We don't have news for Benin yet — but you can still join the discussion below.
Discussions from Benin
No community discussions for Benin yet — be the first to start one.
View all discussions in Benin