LogoAntiCirc
Back to Research Index
🇩🇴

Dominican Rep.

Deep-built
ISO: DOM Region: Latin America

13.7% circumcision prevalence

Prevalence of non-therapeutic male circumcision.

Research coverage

A transparent snapshot of what this file currently contains.

PrevalenceComplete
Categorical profileComplete
Circumcision by intentComplete
Deep write-upsComplete
Native perspectiveAvailable

8

Sources · Citations

8

Verifications · Independent

0

Structured claims · Evidence-based

Jul 9, 2026

Last updated · deep-built

Research note: Dominican Republic DEEP_BUILT 2026-07-01. Morris 2016 PMC4772313: 13.7% (NOT ~90% — CORRECTION: 86% UNcircumcised per 2007 ENDESA DHS, confirmed 3-0). PMC2765614: "no cultural significance, not routinely performed except medically." DISTINCTIVE: first VMMC trial outside Africa (2015, batey communities HIV ~3.2%). HIV ~0.9% UNAIDS; not VMMC priority. Sources #1085-1092. 0 verified incidents. UNREGULATED. No circumcision tradition.

Research claims

Short, testable claims backed by evidence and categorised for clarity.

No structured research claims have been added for Dominican Rep. yet.

Legal status

Unregulated

No Dominican Republic statute, decree, or regulation specifically governs non-therapeutic male circumcision. Male circumcision has no specific cultural or religious significance in the DR and is not routinely performed except when medically indicated. The 2007 national DHS found approximately 86% of men aged 15-59 uncircumcised. The DR ran the first VMMC trial outside Africa (2015, PMC4569265) targeting high-risk batey communities. Female genital mutilation is a separate matter and must not be conflated with male circumcision.

Medical & HIV context

0.9%

Adult HIV prevalence

UNAIDS (2023) · Adults 15–49

no

Circumcision in newborns

Non-therapeutic (cultural practice)

medical indication only

Typical age

Benchmarks are international context — not a local complication rate.

Incident registry

No verified incidents are currently recorded for Dominican Rep..

This absence should not be read as proof that harm does not occur — only that no verified, sourced case has been documented in this database yet.

Country write-ups