In Response to Another Recent Post.

---It's important that you do not assume it was their intention to harm you. That would prompt immediate pushback, denial, and gaslighting. I would approach this from angle that what the parents did or allowed to happen to the R.I.C member is undeniable, but that they are absolved if they wish it only if and when offered. The scar is undeniable, and so the truth is self-evident. The benefits are a blatant lie that insults the intelligence and hygiene practices of the person they speak about, and it is a constant assault of the senses simply knowing what we know. To be incomplete forever, may God make us all whole again. ---Your parents were either lied to or mislead by poisonous aspects of religious propaganda, if not an option #3 which I dare not insinuate here. The hospitals normalized the topic of discussion so much so that the last centuries worth of American's are revealed for what they are, desperate and abused people, some lost unknowingly. Most people mistakenly trust authority as infallible, but at the end of the day we see what that gets us. ---For some reason, people seem to shut their defensive instincts down when in these artificial environments/ sterile medical facilities and seem to trust that the doctors are our countrymen or friends. They defer and go along with the physician because they are afraid to ask questions or disagree out of fear that they will look or sound foolish, telling themselves that they are in control when we both know they weren't. Except they weren't dealing with the family doctors of the baby boomer generations television programming, there are no more home visits/ "house calls," or doctors who walk the same streets we do anymore with a care for each case as if it were critical to their lives. These false doctors and nurses are narcissistic and overworked fast talkers leading to what is essentially the same as factory workers who operate alongside a conveyor belt once a baby is born. There is no forgiveness for what they do, but your parents could not have known this or stood a chance against the onslaught of true mis/dis - information from what is the largest psyops in world history, marking us the same as the slaves of Ancient Egypt, a so-called chosen people, or even as a cleaner people. How could all these things be true at once, especially if not even Jewish or Islamic? ---Some will say that it is antisemitic to feel this way, yet there are both Jew's and former Jew who populate this very subreddit, one JewsAgainstMilah, and alternatives to circumcision within the reformed sects I read. This is not a matter of race and religion; this is a matter of the greatest crime against humanity and insult to both God and the time mothers spend growing their babies within their womb. So much so, that it's as if it were just as much their foreskin that they lost as it was their sons, the mother had to eat for two and grew every molecule of you within her. It's as if we are cut off from our ancestors, so I reject any who attempt to dictate my own position as if I should be made to play a part as their antagonist that they might justify their own cognitive dissonance, if not their own ego's. To act as though Abraham or his son were infants when they made their pact with God, he was old and his son was at least in his pre-teens, living in what amounts to a drought prone desert during a time when the transmission of Sexual diseases is heavily implied. It's a reoccurring theme within the Bible that unclean sex damns us, though what the authors really meant was that some people never washed and had intercourse in ways that leads to infection; trapping and mixing smegma with fecal matter, saliva, blood, urine, and semen both under the foreskin flap and inside the feminine recipient, or rather the man made to play the role at times if forced or coerced. This is not a reason to continue harming babies in modern times. ---In China, there are tales of parents ending the lives of their female offspring at birth. The example I watched claimed that one village did this for 3 months straight, only permitting the males to live, for the Chinese had a one-child-policy for decades until 2016. The reasoning was as simple as it is cruel and mistaken. Parents of the wife receive fewer financial incentives such as a dowry from marriage, while the daughter is normally adopted into the other family in a sense once married. The fear of overpopulation and the national bandwagon led to what they have now which is the fear of population collapse in the future. Too few young people, too many gender/ age ratio imbalances, the betrayal is too great as the men struggle to find wives and start a family. ---For those of us born male within the U.S, there was always a hidden and programmed war on the youth, less overt than in China. That same war of the few who grow old comfortably as their peers suffer and the youth find themselves eaten by the older members of society. During the WW1's bonus army controversy, in which the men who fought in WW1 weren't paid what they were promised in spite of nationalism and family pushing them to enlist. Vietnam's project 100,000 is presented by many to have been a set of policy and military decisions to allow low IQ men to be drafted and accepted into the armed forces. These are men who couldn't read and would panic under fire or fail to understand orders in one the harshest places in the world. It was intentional, hence all the war protest and draft dodgers, they knew that it was a war on their own population just as much as it was on the "enemy." Parent of the Boomers would have shamed and pushed their own children to go and die, believing so much that they are doing what they're supposed to do.